Paste what you are studying. Get quizzed on it in thirty seconds.
Your lecture notes, the chapter you were assigned, the slides from Tuesday, a photo of the whiteboard you typed up. Rereading it does almost nothing. Being asked about it is what makes it stick.
Pick something to practise
The samples are ready-made and need no key. Pasting your own material needs one configured on the server, which it isn’t yet.
Your practice set
You get a hint before you get an answer. Guessing is fine. Looking it up defeats the point.
Your study plan
Built from what you actually missed, not from what you think you missed.
Why this one and not another quiz app
Mapped to the sprint rubric.
| Clarity | Problem: students do not practice enough and they arrive unprepared, because the only practice that exists is whatever we had time to write. When they do study, they reread and highlight, which feels productive and is close to useless. Solution: a tool the student runs on their own material, that quizzes them, coaches the misses, and hands back a study plan built from their actual errors. |
| Relevance | It is discipline-agnostic by construction. The input is whatever the student is already holding, so accounting, marketing, computing, and engineering tech all use the same tool with no question bank to author and no faculty labor to add. Nothing has to be adopted department-wide for one student to benefit tonight. |
| Originality | Three decisions separate it from a quiz generator. Every wrong answer is written to encode a specific misconception, so a miss returns a diagnosis instead of a red X. The coaching is Socratic: a hint on the first miss, the explanation only after a second attempt, which is the difference between AI that makes you think and AI that thinks for you. And the output is a spaced plan plus the questions worth bringing to office hours, which turns a study session into a conversation with the instructor. |
| Feasibility | It runs in a browser tab. No adoption vote, no procurement, no LMS integration required to start, no student account. A faculty member can put the link in a syllabus on Monday. API cost is about a cent per quiz. Students who want it use it; nobody has to be forced. |
| Impact | Retrieval practice and spaced repetition are among the best-evidenced interventions in learning science, and the reason students do not use them is that generating good practice questions is harder than rereading. Removing that friction is the entire intervention. Students get unlimited reps and real feedback at 11 pm on a Sunday, and they walk into office hours with a specific question instead of "I am just lost." |
How it grows
Version one is what you are looking at: a student, their notes, and a browser tab. Nothing else has to happen for it to be useful.
Version two is opt-in. A student can share their concept results with the instructor, and the class-level pattern becomes a pre-class readiness report — which concepts to teach first, before the lecture is written. Same tool, no extra work from the student, and the faculty benefit arrives without anyone being required to participate.